Sustainability Curriculum – As Interesting As It Sounds.

I decided to attend the 1 PM sustainability talk about curriculum (because that was really the only one that fit my schedule) and I will admit I wasn’t really entertained or amused on the subject matter.  The talk basically lasted an hour and was about the new curriculum that Bucknell would put in place in order to get this idea of sustainability across to the students.  It started off with one professor talking about the new requirements for engineers, and how they would need a sustainability class in 3 different categories.  The students would also have 3 free electives to pursue other areas of interest, or to increase their course load on sustainability if they chose to do so.  The talk then transitioned into Professor Hiller talking about sustainability and the management program, and some of the courses to be offered to the students that has a focus on sustainability.  After that was a talk on Bucknell in Nicaragua, and then a sort of summation and wrap up.  At first I thought the talk could have been interesting as they talked about the importance of sustainability to Fortune 500 companies and how a heavy majority issue sustainability reports annually, but then it took a turn towards Bucknell curriculum and it became immediately uninteresting.  I feel as though the seminar was more for current professors than for students.

Our discussion in class afterwards was where my thoughts were when we said that people who are interested in sustainability will pursue these opportunities on their own, and they shouldn’t really have to be forced to take classes on it.  I know I took a class on sustainability and really didn’t find the material to be interesting, personally.  I was okay with taking one course on it, but would NOT want anything else in my curriculum on that material.  I feel like having 3 courses required for sustainability is overkill, and would not be enjoyable for those students who do not want to have a career associated with it.  People who are actually interested in the subject matter will be the ones who will sign up for these classes, and they shouldn’t really be mandatory.  I know I am a management major, but finance interests me so I used my available course space to take classes that I liked.   I think people who like the topic of sustainability would chose to form their curriculum around that interest as I have around finance.

Leaving the seminar I was glad I was a senior and wouldn’t have to take these courses as a requirement.  As a liberal arts school I have already had to take courses I had no interest in (like 2 lab sciences) and wouldn’t want to add more classes to that list.  I think there are other ways to get sustainability into the school.  They could offer more clubs, more classes (but electives, not mandatory), more seminars, or anything that is informative without changing the curriculum.  I understand the importance of the topic, but I don’t see its importance so much at a collegiate level.  A lot of the learning you experience for your career is done on that job, and I find that a lot of things learned in college are eventually lost on kids because it is more theoretical than practical.  Classes help prepare students for work load, time management, listening, oral presentation skills, and many other valuable areas of development, but specific knowledge that will be used on the job is more so learned ON the job.  It should be interesting to see how the new proposed curriculum pans out at Bucknell, and how the students respond.

Bucknell gets Sustainable……in the classroom


Hey everyone, hope you had a Happy Easter. Since I was leaving after class to go home for the weekend and had work in the morning, I was only able to attend the 1 pm session of the Sustainability Seminar about the curriculum. I noticed that there was a significant amount of us that attended this one, so I’ll try not to be too long and do the best I can not to make this sound repetitive. So what is sustainability in the eyes of four Bucknell professors? According to, its defined as “the ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confirmed.” I don’t think this really sums up what they were trying to say, but the website also gives an Environmental Science definition as well. It states, “the quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long-term ecological balance: The committee is developing sustainability standards for products that use energy.” Now this is more likely, as the four professors discussed educating future students at Bucknell on how we should be more environmentally sustainable when making managerial decisions.


Professor Tammy Hiller spoke to me the most, considering I’m a management major and she was speaking for the management program. She discussed how the school of management was recently split up into four degrees and that sustainability was one of them. The courses in this division of management will focus on how to make the future of our world a more sustainable place. I find this interesting, but I have a feeling student will tend to turn away from this kind of major. That’s a personal opinion, but I feel kids will lean more towards finance and marketing. Anyway, this was only a small part of her discussion. She went into greater detail though about how sustainability has not been a major issue for most companies in the recent past. She said now though, that more companies are working towards becoming more sustainable, a lot of them because it is the ethical thing to do. But are all companies eventually going to be sustainable? I don’t think so. There are always people looking to cut corners and as long as they make profits, they won’t care about the state of the environment. Does that mean we need more government regulation or is this just the American way?

Is sustainability a major issue for corporations? Yes. Should we work towards becoming more sustainable for the health of our planet? Definitely. Do we need a whole section of the school of management focusing completely on it? Will wait and see, I guess. I don’t know. I always felt that sustainability courses were good, but not good enough for me to base my major on it. I always felt one class a semester, maybe even a year would be better. What’s your opinion?

Educate yourself

This week I attended the sustainability seminar that spoke about the new curriculum.  I think sustainability is actually a very interesting topic and wish I had attended a different seminar that spoke more about sustainability rather than the curriculum.  I mean yeah, I guess it was somewhat interesting to learn about the new curriculum but to be honest I don’t really care about a curriculum that wasn’t offered to me.

Don’t get me wrong, I do think that sustainability is an extremely important topic but I’m not sure its something that can be taught in the classroom.  I really think it is something that you kind of have to go out and learn on your own.  Its similar to what we were talking about in class with taking an entrepreneurial class.  There is no reason to do this, it’s more of something you just have to go out and learn on your own.

I hate to be so distraught towards I school I love but to be honest I kind of feel like this whole sustainability notion is more of a facade than something that is actually real.  I feel like Bucknell is doing it in order to look better in the eyes of a number of different people and so that they can make the claim that Bucknell is a highly “sustainable” campus.  Like I saw in some other posts, it is important to highlight that sustainability doesn’t just mean saving the environment.  I do support the parts of engineering curriculum that are being changed but I am by no means a huge fan of what is going on in the management school.


Would you have gone to one of these sustainability conferences if Professor Comas didn’t have a sign up sheet?  Probably not.

Would you have made a blog post about it if we weren’t asked to?  Probably not, either.

I was going to preface these two questions by saying, “I’m not trying to be cynical.”  BUT I AM.  Sorry, cynicism runs in my blood.  I hope that doesn’t make you think I’m an awful person.  Just hear me out for a bit.

Some people in this class probably would have gone to one of the sustainability conferences during the day even if it wasn’t asked of us by Professor Comas.  How many would that have been, though?  I’d guess 3.  Maybe 4.  I’m not trying to offend anyone, but let’s be honest here.  I know I wouldn’t have gone.

In regards to my second question, don’t kid yourself.  99% of our activity on The Bucknell Blog is because it’s part of our grade.  Remember when we ran out of time last class period, and Alex said to comment on his ‘Rehab’ Blog Council post any thoughts or questions we had?  Well, SHOCKER: there aren’t any comments on it.  Speaking of comments, how many of you have ever left more than 3 in a week?  Probably not many.

Now, if you’re still reading, I hope you’re laughing because that means I’m right on some of these things.  If you’re not laughing and anxiously waiting to leave one of your 3 comments (LOL) at the bottom saying how wrong I am, kudos to you: you’re awesome.  And I’m not being condescending; you really are.  You see, the point to my whole blog post here is people need consequences to get things done.  Sure, all of us have passions in which we are self-motivated: music, sports, reading, writing, HECK even blogging and doing homework for this class.  But for the other things in our life, we get motivation from the consequences of doing/not doing them.  For example: I am writing this blog post now because it will help me graduate, which will give me a degree from Bucknell, which will look good for me as I enter the professional world. 🙂

Our beautiful universidad.

Here’s the important part though: CONSEQUENCES AREN’T A BAD THING.  Not even close.  In fact, they’re a great thing.  They’ve forced me to write about the ethics pertaining to Enron and its collapse.  They’ve forced me to read what my classmates think about the climate of Bucknell.  They’ve opened my eyes to new and exciting material that I wouldn’t have otherwise learned about.  I can say the same thing about several other classes here at Bucknell, too.  Think back in your life to the consequences, either good or bad, that have made you who you are today.  Not just in school, but in all facets of your life.  When my basketball team lost to Lehigh in the Patriot League Championship last year, I told myself I wouldn’t feel that same heartache again this year.  When we won it this year, the joy and satisfaction motivated me to work and focus even harder that week leading up to our NCAA Tournament game.  After losing that game to Butler, the disappointment has motivated to get ready for the NBA Draft.

So how does this relate to the sustainability session that I attended?  That is the topic of the post, after all. 🙂  Well, I attended the 1pm session, and as some of you have included in your own posts, an older gentleman asked a very interesting question at the very end of it all.  Basically, he asked how students would take this new ‘sustainability’ knowledge and apply it in ‘the real world’, since many important companies have a long established way of doing things in a very hierarchical manner.  The question made me think.  And I realized that the answer lies in his very question: hierarchy.  Sustainability doesn’t come from freshly graduated college students entering a job at a Fortune 500 company and suddenly changing its culture.  That’s simply not realistic.  Instead, sustainability comes from consequences that these companies will face if they don’t meet certain requirements by the government.

You can call me a socialist, but if you really want results, that’s the only way to do it in my opinion.  If I offended you with anything I said above, I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to.  I am also now realizing I may be in way over my head in terms of theoretical approaches to government involvement in the private sector and stuff like that, but hey, that’s a consequence I’m willing to take. 🙂 🙂 🙂

P.S. The Easter bunny doesn’t exist.  Enjoy your Reese’s Peanut Butter Eggs.

Sustainability: Not JUST Living Well Within Means

Alf Siewers (gotta love the beard)

Alf Siewers and his dog (gotta love the beard)

I attended the 10am symposium in which the topic was: What is sustainability and how does this concept apply to Bucknell? The discussions were moderated by Peter Wilshusen and featured talks by Alf Siewers (English), David Kristjanson-Gural (Economics), and Jamie Hendry (Management). The talks were very interesting as each of the professors had a different take on what sustainability meant to them and the different issues surrounding sustainability based on their own definitions.

Continue reading

A Green Bucknell


The session I participated discussed about the sustainability program on campus. My favorite one was the “Green Roof” project. It is beautiful and sustainable.

Green Roof is a project, which encourages people cover the roof of a building with vegetables and green plants. The green roof would be built over the waterproof membrane, root barrier and drainage and irrigation system. Each pants occupies a spot.

Green Roof has many environmental benefits. First, a concentrate of green roofs in an urban area can reduce the city’s average temperatures during summer. Second, green roof could create natural habitat for animals. Third, it can filter the pollutants and carbon dioxide out of air, which helps power disease rates such as asthma. Green roof can also filter pollutants and heavy metals out of rainwater. Fourth, it can increase agricultural space. Agricultural space is short especially in countries with large population or limited land, for example, China, India and Japan.

Green roof also provides economic benefits. First, it can increase the roof’s lifespan. Green roof could protect the waterproofing membrane from UV light in order to increase the life expectancy. Second, green roof could reduce the energy use as I mentioned above. It can help to lower temperature of building and save the energy-use of air conditioner.

Bucknell could apply Green Roof project in the future as the leading example of sustainability. Besides the “Green Roof” project, Bucknell are considering to use the wind energy by setting the wind turbine near campus. Also, the solar panels would be considered to be installed in dormitory areas